Write it once
Author a coding question with its visible and hidden test cases in the platform, and it is ready to drop into any paper afterwards.
Coding assessments for education
Coding assessment software built for education
Create browser-based coding tests, let students write and run real code, evaluate submissions with visible and hidden test cases, and turn results into insights teachers can act on.
Built for teaching code
Everything educators need to run better coding assessments
Create, deliver, evaluate, and review coding assessments in one workflow, with results that help teachers understand what students can actually do.
Build reusable coding questions
Create problems once, add test cases and settings, then reuse them across classes and assessments.
Let students code in the browser
Students can write, run, debug, and submit real code without installing anything.
Evaluate with test cases
Use visible and hidden test cases to check submissions consistently while keeping teacher review where needed.
Understand where students struggle
See performance by student, class, question, and assessment so teachers know what needs attention next.
The question library
Every good question, kept for the next time you need it
A coding question is expensive to write and cheap to reuse. The library is where the department's questions, their test cases and their tags live between assessments.
Bring what you already have
Structured question collections import in bulk, so a department that has been writing papers for years does not start from an empty library.
Find it again
Search, filter and tag by subject, difficulty and question type, and add what you find straight to the paper you have open.
Know which questions are working
Once enough students have answered one, the library shows which questions are performing badly and which have drifted, measured from real submissions rather than guessed at.
A second pair of eyes before it ships
Every question carries a review state of its own, so a department can approve what goes into a paper instead of finding out a question was wrong after the class has sat it.
Shared, or kept to yourself
A question can sit in the bank the whole department draws from, or stay with the teacher who wrote it until it is ready for everyone else.
Running the test
From a scheduled paper to a decision you can defend
The hour the test runs is an operations problem before it is an academic one. These are the parts of it the platform takes on.
The window and the rules
Set the schedule, the duration and the grading before anyone starts, so the rules are the same for every student who sits it.
Who sits it
Send the paper to a whole class or to a named list of students, without rebuilding the paper for each group.
What happens during
Attempts and integrity events are recorded as they happen, so nothing has to be reconstructed from memory afterwards.
What you get back
Automatic marking on the objective and coding answers, written responses routed for review, and the class result ready the same week.
PrintMark
Take any assessment to paper, without losing the data
Plenty of assessment still happens on paper, and it usually lives in a register that never meets the rest of a student's record. Here it does.
Print any test as a paper
Anything already in your question library becomes a question paper. Nothing is retyped.
You choose the layout
A quarter, half or full page of answer space per question, in one column or two.
A separate answer key
Prints on its own, marked with the option letters a student sees rather than raw numbers.
Marks in by keyboard
Students down, questions across. One-mark questions move on as you type, so a whole class goes in without the mouse.
A blank is not a zero
Nor is an absence. A student who missed the paper gets no record for it, rather than a mark of nought that drags the class average down.
Feeds the same reports
A paper test lands in the same student record as an online one, so topic, outcome and per-question reporting take it in without a separate step.
Assessment integrity and accountability
Controls designed for serious academic coding assessments
Programming assessments need a focused testing environment as well as a clear record of student work. Teemly keeps access scoped by institution and role, with relevant activity available for review.
Read the data agreementFullscreen controls
Require a focused assessment environment for browser-based tests.
Tab-switch events
Make relevant focus changes visible in the assessment record.
Clipboard controls
Apply practical copy-and-paste restrictions during online assessments.
Auditable activity
Review relevant assessment activity with associated users and timestamps.
How it compares
Where this sits against the other things you could use
Quiz tools, exam platforms, learning systems and hiring products all overlap with parts of this. The difference is what you are left holding after the test.
| How we compare | Teemly | Quiz tools | Exam platforms | Learning systems | Hiring coding tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Built for | Teaching institutions | Quick quizzes | Conducting exams | Course delivery | Technical hiring |
| Question types | MCQ, written and coding | Mostly objective | Objective and written | Varies | Coding only |
| Reusable question library | Across subjects and types | Basic | Common | Common | Coding only |
| Grading | Automatic, with written review | Objective only | Mostly objective | Basic | Code evaluation |
| Offline papers recorded too | Yes | No | Usually not | Usually not | No |
| Classes and cohorts | Built in | Limited | Varies | Core structure | Limited |
| Reporting | Student, class and subject | Quiz scores | Exam reports | Course progress | Candidate results |
Categories rather than named products, because a comparison against a specific tool goes out of date the week that tool ships something, and a comparison that is wrong is worse than none at all.
Questions about coding assessment
Frequently asked questions
Can students write code directly in the browser?
Yes. Students can open a coding assessment, write and run code in the browser, and submit their solution without installing separate tools.
Can teachers use visible and hidden test cases?
Yes. Visible test cases help students understand the task, while hidden cases help educators evaluate correctness and edge cases beyond the sample answer.
Can coding assessments include MCQ and written questions?
Yes. Teemly supports coding, multiple-choice, and written questions in one assessment, so educators can assess practical and theoretical understanding together.
Who is Teemly coding assessment software for?
Teemly is built for education organizations that need to assess programming as part of a teaching workflow rather than technical hiring.
How is pricing calculated?
Pricing is based on the institution's student count and billed monthly. Teachers, classes, and platform features are included rather than sold as separate add-ons. Visit the pricing page when you are ready to assess fit.
Book a demo